Vishwaas AI vs Seqrite.
A privacy module inside a security suite is not a proof-first privacy platform.
Seqrite (Quick Heal) is a respected Indian security vendor whose data-privacy capability sits inside a broader security suite. DPDP defensibility is a different discipline from endpoint and network security: it turns on whether each consent record is independently provable and whether the full privacy operation is evidence-grade. We compare on that axis.
Security controls are table stakes. Provable consent is the product.
Encryption and access control are necessary but do not answer the DPBI's question — can you prove this consent record is the one written that day, in the notice language the principal saw?
| Criterion | Seqrite | Vishwaas AI |
|---|---|---|
| Primary discipline | ✕Endpoint / network security suite | ✓Proof-first privacy & consent operations |
| Consent evidence mechanism | ✕Database / audit log | ✓SHA-256 hash chain + RSA signatures + RFC 3161 timestamps |
| Tamper-evidence | ✕Access controls around the data | ✓Structural — append-only ledger, a broken chain is self-evident |
| DPR SLA automation (§§11–14) | ✕Limited / add-on | ✓Access, correction, erasure, grievance, nomination with SLA clocks |
| Eighth Schedule 22 languages | ✕Not a core focus | ✓Per-language SHA-256 notice hashing across all 22 languages |
| Breach 72h DPBI workflow (§8(6)) | ✕Incident response, security-shaped | ✓DPBI 72h + CERT-In 6h countdown with notification templates |
| India data residency | ✕India-based | ✓ap-south-1, no cross-border transfer |
Securing the data is not the same as proving the consent.
Two different burdens of proof.
Where a security-suite module stops
Bring your toughest 'prove it' question.
30 minutes with a privacy engineer. We run the verifier on real data and show the privacy operation end to end — beyond what a security-suite module covers.